<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fiscal Cliff Disaster Averted, but Trouble Looms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/fiscal-cliff-disaster-averted-but-trouble-looms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/fiscal-cliff-disaster-averted-but-trouble-looms/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the author of &#34;Donor-Centered Planned Gift Marketing&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael J. Rosen, CFRE</title>
		<link>http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/fiscal-cliff-disaster-averted-but-trouble-looms/#comment-3496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael J. Rosen, CFRE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/?p=1699#comment-3496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skip, thank you for commenting and sharing the link to your blog. As you know, our democracy has a number of weaknesses, some by design while others are through evolution. The &quot;Fiscal Cliff&quot; and debt mess remind me of a relevant quote from 19th century writer Alexis de Tocqueville: &quot;The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public&#039;s money.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skip, thank you for commenting and sharing the link to your blog. As you know, our democracy has a number of weaknesses, some by design while others are through evolution. The &#8220;Fiscal Cliff&#8221; and debt mess remind me of a relevant quote from 19th century writer Alexis de Tocqueville: &#8220;The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public&#8217;s money.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worden Report</title>
		<link>http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/fiscal-cliff-disaster-averted-but-trouble-looms/#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Worden Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/?p=1699#comment-3495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using the debt ceiling and the &quot;fiscal cliff&quot; as leverage to extract additional concessions from the other party may be clever hard-ball politics, but at what cost to the rest of us? In http://www.thewordenreport.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-debt-ceiling-and-fiscal-cliff-as.html at the Worden Report, I argue that the high-stakes political poker game may reflect a weakness in democracy itself. In short, self-governance does not confront hard problems very well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the debt ceiling and the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; as leverage to extract additional concessions from the other party may be clever hard-ball politics, but at what cost to the rest of us? In <a href="http://www.thewordenreport.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-debt-ceiling-and-fiscal-cliff-as.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thewordenreport.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-debt-ceiling-and-fiscal-cliff-as.html</a> at the Worden Report, I argue that the high-stakes political poker game may reflect a weakness in democracy itself. In short, self-governance does not confront hard problems very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Special Report: Are You Ready for 2013? These FREE Resources Will Help &#124; Michael Rosen Says&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/fiscal-cliff-disaster-averted-but-trouble-looms/#comment-3181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Special Report: Are You Ready for 2013? These FREE Resources Will Help &#124; Michael Rosen Says&#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 04:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/?p=1699#comment-3181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#171; Fiscal Cliff Disaster Averted, but Trouble&#160;Looms&#160;&#160;&#124;&#160;&#160; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Fiscal Cliff Disaster Averted, but Trouble&nbsp;Looms&nbsp;&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael J. Rosen, CFRE</title>
		<link>http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/fiscal-cliff-disaster-averted-but-trouble-looms/#comment-3114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael J. Rosen, CFRE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/?p=1699#comment-3114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard, thank you for your comment. For the reasons you&#039;ve stated, I&#039;ve encouraged organizations not to think of government funding as &lt;em&gt;philanthropic&lt;/em&gt; revenue. By tracking government money and philanthropic money separately, it makes it easier to track true development performance and government relations performance more accurately. It also gives board members a much more clear view of things. I once served on a board that separated the two revenue streams. The social service agency received a great deal of government support while underperforming in the development arena. Once the board better understood the numbers, and following a strategic planning process, the agency made the committment to ramp-up its development effort. Staff was added and upgraded. The result has been, even during the recession, an increase in the philanthropic revenue stream. Because of its true fundraising success, the organization was able to relocate to a larger facility and is now serving many more people than it was able to serve in its former, cramped offices. Government support continues to be important to the agency, but the growing development program means it is less dependent on government money than it has ever been and it means it can continue to expand its services.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, thank you for your comment. For the reasons you&#8217;ve stated, I&#8217;ve encouraged organizations not to think of government funding as <em>philanthropic</em> revenue. By tracking government money and philanthropic money separately, it makes it easier to track true development performance and government relations performance more accurately. It also gives board members a much more clear view of things. I once served on a board that separated the two revenue streams. The social service agency received a great deal of government support while underperforming in the development arena. Once the board better understood the numbers, and following a strategic planning process, the agency made the committment to ramp-up its development effort. Staff was added and upgraded. The result has been, even during the recession, an increase in the philanthropic revenue stream. Because of its true fundraising success, the organization was able to relocate to a larger facility and is now serving many more people than it was able to serve in its former, cramped offices. Government support continues to be important to the agency, but the growing development program means it is less dependent on government money than it has ever been and it means it can continue to expand its services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Freedlund</title>
		<link>http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/fiscal-cliff-disaster-averted-but-trouble-looms/#comment-3113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Freedlund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelrosensays.wordpress.com/?p=1699#comment-3113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael,

As you said,&quot;The situation must be dealt with for the good of the nation.&quot; Unfortunately, since the government has run out of money, unless it borrows more, that means less support to organizations through grants and other support. Too many organizations have come to rely on Federal support as a major chunk of their budgets, evolving from charities to quasi-government programs. They turned to the government&#039;s money, taxpayer money, and away from finding individual donors and other sources of revenue. As I stated in my most recent blog, A Voice in the Wilderness,&quot;If you read the definition of &lt;em&gt;philanthropy&lt;/em&gt; in the dictionary, you will not find the word &lt;em&gt;government&lt;/em&gt;.&quot; Nonprofits must learn to turn away from the &quot;easy&quot; money of government support and return to telling their stories to the public, build their bases with individuals and businesses, and cultivate long term support from those sources. Otherwise, not only are they contributing to the excessive spending that is out of control, but their addiction will be painful when the government finally chooses to be responsible and cuts funding for their programs. I have found that it is always preferable to make that decision yourself before someone makes that decision for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>As you said,&#8221;The situation must be dealt with for the good of the nation.&#8221; Unfortunately, since the government has run out of money, unless it borrows more, that means less support to organizations through grants and other support. Too many organizations have come to rely on Federal support as a major chunk of their budgets, evolving from charities to quasi-government programs. They turned to the government&#8217;s money, taxpayer money, and away from finding individual donors and other sources of revenue. As I stated in my most recent blog, A Voice in the Wilderness,&#8221;If you read the definition of <em>philanthropy</em> in the dictionary, you will not find the word <em>government</em>.&#8221; Nonprofits must learn to turn away from the &#8220;easy&#8221; money of government support and return to telling their stories to the public, build their bases with individuals and businesses, and cultivate long term support from those sources. Otherwise, not only are they contributing to the excessive spending that is out of control, but their addiction will be painful when the government finally chooses to be responsible and cuts funding for their programs. I have found that it is always preferable to make that decision yourself before someone makes that decision for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
